utorak, 25. kolovoza 2009.

The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe, Part II


Tom Sunic August 14, 2009

The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe,

Part II

The word and epithet „racist“ and „racism“ are usually hurled against White nationalists, never ever scathing other racial non-European outgroups. ; Over the last fifty years, no effort has been spared by the Western system and its mediacracy to pathologize White Western peoples into endless atonement and perpetual guilt feelings about their White race. The intended goal was to create a perception that all non-European races and outgroups are immune to sentiments of xenophobia or racial exclusion. The incessant anti-White propaganda and the idealization of non-Whites has attained grotesque dimensions, resulting in clinical self-hate and neurotic behavior among the majority of Whites.

Were such sickening attitudes of White Europeans and White Americans not suicidal, they would appear laughable at best. The sense of territorial imperative, the seething interracial hate is far more salient and violent among and amidst non-Whites than among Whites.

Beauty of the Beast

Mexican Americans do not like African Americans (see here, here). Neither do American Asians like African Americans and Mexican Americans combined (see AmRen’s list of racial conflict in the US). In a likely scenario of Whites becoming a displaced minority in the USA and Europe, other races would soon be at each other's throat with violence surpassing the imagination of White peoples.

Similarly, in South Africa, the influential Xhosa tribesmen, who hold important political positions, resent Zulus, but so are they themselves the target of hate by Ndebele and Kwazulus. In Rwanda, Tutsis, who consider themselves more “European“ and more civilized, hate Hutus, but so do Hutus hate Tutsis. Generally, Arab-speaking populations in northern Africa and the Middle East resent dark, Black neighbors below the Sahara belt.

The Sikhs in Punjab consider themselves the best looking people on the Indian subcontinent, ridiculing as less human the populace in neighboring Rajasthan. It is a common practice among Indian women, but also among women in the Middle East, not to expose themselves to sun, as White skin has more charm and provides huge social prestige. The ex-president of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto, with her quasi-Euro- Mediterranean facial traits and complexion, gave her country an enormous sense of pride.

A Mexican cabbage picker from Salinas in California's Central Valley is often encouraged by do-good US liberal White attorneys to yammer about being discriminated by Whites, and, of course, this is standard procedure for organizations like the anti-White ADL. Yet it would never cross the cabbage picker's mind to voice similar grievances or ask the ADL to remedy his lot in his native Mexico. It is considered an unwritten rule that the bulk of the Mexican diplomatic corps should be made up of Whites, „hidalgos of sorts, so that a California „cholonever dares to envisage his niche amidst them. He knows very well his socio-racial place, and if not tempted by robbing or stealing he can only dream in his barrio about having his sister or daughter married to a light skinned Anglo. Former Mexican president Vicente Fox (who did his best to make the US a non-White country by ridding Mexico of its dark-skinned citizens) looked more like a picture perfect antebellum „gringo“ than like an LA „beaner“.

In Turkey high social positions and political perks, as well as diplomatic postings are the protected turf of individuals whose ancestry goes back to White slaves from 16th-century Southeastern Europe and the 18th-century Transcaucasia-not to the steppes of Turkmenistan. There is no worse insult for a Turk or an Iranian to dub them „Arabs“- which they are not. In the Red Light District of Istanbul, Aksaray, a stupendous 6-foot White Russian hooker is very, very pricy indeed, whereas a ride with a tiny Pilipino woman costs almost nothing. The father of modern Turkey, Kemal Pasha Ataturk, was a tall man with blue eyes of either Illyrian or Slavic ancestry, who spent more time brooding over modern Turks as hypothetical descendants of the Indo-European Hittites than recounting the exploits of pillaging Asiatic horsemen. It would never ever cross the mind of a stocky half-Mongoloid, unibrow blue collar worker in Ankara to ask for his share of Turkish social glitz - except when he arrives to Germany or Belgium with already good premonition of Germany's self-hate and its tax payers' largesse.

„We“ vs. „They" � the "Other“ is the basic conceptual pillar in the studies of racial psychology, whereby every racial group or subgroup dreams to be a bit more of the Other, provided that the Other is genetically better equipped. Thus an attractive White European or American woman with recessive Mediterranean genes may nervously pluck the stubborn hair on her upper lip or depilates her widow's peak. Or a short Alpine-headed man from southern France may purchase high-healed boots. These are often issues of social acceptance or social rejection. Sometimes they can be matters of life or death.

One can only imagine the dramatic self-perception of non-Whites landing in America or in Europe, however modest or low their IQ may be. After all, which non-European mother, be it in Berlin, Stockholm, or San Antonio, does not strive to see, or at least project her son or daughter into a better gene pool, however much she may envy or hate her White host? And if her son is already doomed to be a victim of poor heredity, then some hyper-real surgical trick might do the job - as witnessed by the facial escapades of the Western hero, the late pop star Michael Jackson.

The Painful Otherness

The normative concept of beauty and the general code of social and political conduct and civility are exclusively of European origin. This includes the famous “body language” practiced by White liberal politicians and avidly mimicked by non-white politicians. Hence the norm for all peoples, of all races world-wide is to accept White Otherness either by emulating or mimicking its phenotype. The Western heritage, regardless of whether it is despised or loved by non-Europeans, is viewed either consciously or subconsciously as the ideal type and role model for all.

The major crime of the liberal system and its human rights pontiffs is that on the one hand it preaches diversity and uniqueness of each culture and each ethnic group, while on the other hand, because of its egalitarian, levelling and procrustean tactics, it fosters discriminatory policies against all races and all peoples wordwide. The liberal ideology of global “panmixia” destroys individual cultures of different peoples while imposing feelings of cultural and racial inferiority on all. Thus, many non-Europeans, especially if cultivated, are implicitly forced to be ashamed of their roots, while accepting something which is alien to their psychophysical and cultural heritage.

While Europeans of different ethnic origins and with different facial traits (Dinaric, Alpine, Mediterranean, Nordic) do not have trouble in blending in, non-European races have considerable difficulties. This often results in feelings of racial exclusion, and consequently in criminal activities, especially among younger new comers to the USA or to Europe.

In a little known, yet highly significant preface to the second edition of his once famous book (Rasse und Seele [Race and Soul], 2nd edition, 1943), and following the attacks by the Vatican clergy against the racial laws of Nationalist Socialist Germany, the once-famous German psychologist and anthropologist Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss, wrote:

We have been accused of considering only the Nordic race as worthy and all other races as inferior. Wherever such "evidence" was believed, it has affected us negatively.

This is especially true because the word "Nordic" is easily misunderstood and misinterpreted by laymen, which has created all kinds of mischief. This was entirely mistaken and unnecessary.

It is true that in Germany and elsewhere, a number of books and booklets have been published that assert this sort of thing. From the beginning, the psychology of race clearly teaches us that each race finds ultimate value in itself. ... In the final analysis it is the only factor that determines racial-spiritual values.

Every race bears within itself its own value system and standard of excellence; and no race can be evaluated by the standards of any other race. ... Only a person who could stand above all races and transcend race would be able to make "objective" statements about a given human race. ... Such a person does not exist, however, because to be human means to be conditioned and determined by race.

Perhaps God knows the true hierarchy of races, but we humans do not.

The German Volk or Nation is a mixture of various races, in which the Nordic race clearly predominates. However, there is an admixture of „Blood“ in the German Volk (for example Mediterranean). Today it is no longer possible to sow mistrust between friendly peoples. ... Each step in international and colonial politics confirms the tenets of racial psychology and increases its usefulness (practical utility) in dealing with different peoples. Its goal is not to divide and separate nations, but rather to connect them by objectively establishing enlightened understanding between them.(my translation)

Clauss is labelled a “Nazi scholar” by his Jewish and liberal detractors, although some of his remarks run counter to Hollywood custom-designed “Nazi Nordicists” and self-proclaimed Aryans, all the more because Clauss, like many German anthropologists, wrote much about Bedouins, and is still considered an authority on Arabic culture.

The Jew vs. the Same

It would be interesting to find out what was crossing the mind of the Jewish American author Susan Sontag, who famously said that the White race is the cancer of human history”. If one grants that the White race is a cancer, Susan Sontag is putting herself in an awkward position. Does she reject being White? Implicitly she suggested that Jews are not Whites, which only confirms the thesis of hundreds if not millions of of White racialists that Jews constitute a unique racial/ethnic group - and not just a different culture or a different religion.

Consequently, can Sontag’s Jewish compatriots be Whites - in the sense their White Euro-American liberal friends want them to be? Her defamatory comments on Whites imply that Jews do not fall into the category of Whites. But as practice has shown in Jew-Gentile relationships all over the West, neither do they like being called “Jews” by non-Jews - except when they need to capitalize on their Jewishness, both figuratively and financially. Yet implicitly,many Jews, while rejecting Whiteness in its “anti-Semitic” “right-wing”, or “Nazi” connotation - are not at all opposed to displaying their Whiteness. The late Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, with his feigned self-assertiveness, must have been well aware that his quasi-Nordic facial traits would be popular with his fellow Jews.

Many Jews quite rightly resent the German word and the concept of “Mischlinge” (crossbreeds) or “Mauscheljude” (trickster Jew or hidden Jew). At the same time, many Jews like to conceal as much as they can their original Turko-Kazharic-Semitic features. As I wrote earlier, the more things look hyper-real, the more real they get eventually. By the same logic, if Jews get upset by anti-Semites, why not call Jews Semites? Most likely this would be an offensive word for them too.

Tons of books on this subject are very difficult to obtain, especially if written in German. As a result, this most incendiary topic of our times is debated only in private or avoided completely. One thing is when Jewish authors like Salcia Landmann (Die Juden als Rasse, 1981) and Jon Entine (Abraham's Children: Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People) write objectively - albeit from a Jewish perspective - about the “Jews as a race”. Yet it is quite a different story when a famous German anthropologist and eugenicist, also dubbed a “Nazi”, Otmar von Verschuer, writes about “the Jewish race”. It appears that the expression and the concept “the Jewish race” can only have safe passage and scholarly legitimacy when used and discussed by Jews.

To be continued.

Tom Sunic (
www.tomsunic.info; http://doctorsunic.netfirms.com/) is an author, former political science professor in the USA, translator and former Croat diplomat. He is the author of Against Democracy and Equality: The European New Right (1990, 2002) . Email him.

Permanent link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Sunic-RaceII.html

četvrtak, 20. kolovoza 2009.

Snjeguljica zbog gospodarske krize otpustila 4 patuljka

Trpimir Gudar 9. kolovoz 2009.

Snjeguljica zbog gospodarske krize otpustila 4 patuljka

„Nekoć davno postojao je u zemlji Hrvatskoj jedan narod koji se zvao – gle čuda – Hrvati. Bio je to ratnički narod, ali narod koji nije znao prepoznati lukavost i opasnost koja mu je dolazila od svojih susjeda i onih koji to baš i nisu…“ Tako će možda jednog dana, dana bez Hrvata, pisati u bajkama i pričama o starim vremenima i nekim narodima koji svoju sudbinu i život nisu znali zadržati u svojim rukama. No, budući da ja nisam fatalist, a bome ne želim svoju sudbinu predati ni u ruke Božje ni „međunarodne zajednice“, preostaje mi samo obavljati svoje deržanstvo i dati barem mali obol hrvatskoj državotvornoj borbi koja, nažalost, još nije došla do tog trenutka da svoj cilj ostvari. A cilja, (Nezavisne) Države Hrvatske, ne će ni biti ako nam tzv. „javno mnijenje“ budu tvorila piskarala poput Jergovića, Butkovića, Pilsela, Tomića, Dežulovića i drugova. Jer, kako očekivati stvaranje Države, ako nema naroda koji bi ju stvorio, nastanjivao i izgrađivao? A kako očuvati narod od gospodarskog, moralnog i demografskog uništenja, ako nam gore navedene budale izgrađuju stav i govore što da mislimo?

Dobro je Mladen Schwartz, hrvatski filozof i političar, rekao: „Slobodni tisak mnogo je opširniji, brbljiviji od onog „neslobodnog“, mediji općenito neprestance diskutiraju, debatiraju, dijalogiziraju – ali velika većina sadržina što ih donose proizvedena je za makulaturu, za smetlište.“ („Laž, zločin i smrt demokracije“, Iuvenalis Samizdat, 2003.). Nije čudno što se sve dnevne tiskovine iz dana u dan sve više pune raznim komentarima čitatelja, kolumnama polupismenih novinarčića, osvrtima nevladinih organizacija, a ide se čak dotle da se komentari raznih nepismenih i politički neizgrađenih koristnika interneta prenose s internetskog izdanja dotičnih novina i objavljuju u tiskanom izdanju. U nedostatku pravih viesti ili, bolje rečeno, u nedostatku viesti koje čitatelj „treba znati“, novine se pune pornografskim uradcima hrvatske „estrade“, viestima o tzv. celebrityjima (ta koliko puta dnevno čujemo novosti o životnim i ljubavnim jadima Simonice i Ante?!), stalnim izvješćima s bezbrojnih nogometnih utakmica i ostalih športskih natjecanja, zatim raznim praznovjernim „astroložkim“ i „ezoteričnim“ sadržajima, i t.d. Naravno, konstanta medijske slobode u svim tiskovinama i medijima u RH je – laž. Bez toga ne ide, uostalom, ona i drži cieli sustav na okupu kako se sve ne bi - kao one, po njih zloslutne, 1941. godine - razpalo. Iako se svečano deklamira o nekakvoj trodiobi vlasti na zakonodavnu, izvršnu i sudsku, novine bez imalo srama provode svoj utjecaj i na prvu i treću navedenu vlast. Zakoni, koje vlast donosi, detaljno se analiziraju te zatim lijevoliberalni oporbenjaci, koji imaju novinskom prostoru zajamčen pristup, iznose svoju jednostranu kritiku zakonodavnog pristupa vladajućih. Obtuženike, pa čak i osumnjičenike, osuđuje se prije nego i sud započne sa sudskim procesom (tako su, na primjer, Zagorec i Glavaš osuđeni za inkriminirano djelo već i prije početka samog procesa, a sada je Rončević kriv bio čak i prije podnošenja same kaznene prijave). Sudci koji ne udovolje medijskoj presudi, poput gospićkog sudca Milanovića, prikazuju se u tim medijima kao „luđaci“, „šovinisti“, kao ljudi koji ne znaju svoj posao (pritom nema veze što za taj posao imaju veću legitimaciju nego novinari koji o njima pišu). Sada dolazimo do te novinarske kvalifikacije koja se upućuje nepodobnim osobama u javnom životu. Njih se karakterizira kao nazadnjake koji se usuđuju ne prihvatiti progresivne (naprednjačke) ideje liberal-demokracije. Još 1944. George Orwell, britanski književnik i novinar, osvrnuo se na stalno kvalificiranje „fašistima“ svih političkih i inih neistomišljenika, pa tako on govori da „rieč „fašizam“, kad se koristi, je skoro uviek bez značenja. U razgovoru, naravno, ona je rabljena u još širem značenju nego u tisku. Čuo sam da ona upućuje na farmere, trgovce, davatelje kredita, (…) Rudyarda Kiplinga, Gandhija, Čang Kai-Šeka, homoseksualce, astrologe, žene, pse i što sve ne.“ („What is Fascism?“, Tribune, 1944.). Orwell kasnije u svojim romanima „Životinjska farma“ i „1984.“ provlači kritiku kako komunizma tako i prikrivenog totalitarizma liberal-demokracije. Hrvatski diplomat, politolog i bivši politički emigrant, dr.Tomislav Sunić (koji je, inače, u svietu cienjen kao teoretičar europske Nove Desnice) piše o tom fenomenu ovako: „Liberalni sistem po svojoj povijesnoj dinamici i intelektualnoj logici, izbjegava stvaranje političkih žrtava. On ne koristi represiju nego, nekad „vaudeville“, a danas televiziju i „non stop light-show“. Sve ono što komunizam nije mogao postići putem Gulaga, Lepoglave, Bleiburga, Urengoja, Dragača, itd., itd., liberalni sistem uspijeva na miran, mekan, smiren i „pluralistički“ način. U komunizmu je nekad postojala šačica disidenata; u liberalizmu je svaka pomisao na istinsku oporbu nezamisliva. Pojedinac koji danas sumnja u liberalne aksiome, tj. teologiju tržišta, ideologiju ljudskih prava, pojedinac koji dvoji u eklezijastiku kraja povijesti ili u dogmu o vječitom ekonomskom rastu, biva u liberalnom katekizmu proglašen luđakom. Takvog luđaka liberalni sistem ne ubija niti ne zatvara; njega se diskretno medijski izolira, ili još gore, njemu se oduzima mikrofon i javno liberalno glasilo.“ („Fragmenti metapolitike“, naklada K.Krešimir, 1998.). Svakome je poznato na koji način se danas Adolfa Hitlera sotonizira – naziva ga se luđakom. Slične izraze i razpoloženje mediji imaju i prema Mladenu Schwartzu koji, uz Dobroslava Paragu, zauzima prvo mjesto na popisu ljudi koji ne smiju imati pristup medijima u ovoj Republici Hrvatskoj.

Svoje manipulacije i senzacije, umanjivanja i preuveličavanja, mudrovanja i laži, novinar u većini slučajeva začinjava pretencioznim i lažnim naslovom (čija je veličina obrnuto proporcionalna njegovoj istinitosti) koji govori sve osim o – sadržaju članka. Zato ovaj svoj mali uradak i naslovih na taj način, i to šalom koja je izrečena u jednoj hrvatskoj humorističnoj emisiji.

Želimo li sve to stanje popraviti, da jednog dana ljudi ne bi mogli rabiti Thompsonovu sintagmu „bilo jednom u Hrvatskoj“, moramo se uistinu probuditi te hrabro i mudro, uz priznavanje pune istine (ovaj put i uz punu cienu), razmisliti kakvu budućnost želimo Hrvatskoj i Hrvatima. Kada će hrvatski narod postati Narod, a hrvatska država postati Država, ovisi o nama i našoj spremnosti za nacionalnu žrtvu, bez koje nema niti je ikad bilo obstanka za narodnu zajednicu.

Trpimir Gudar, Kastav

utorak, 18. kolovoza 2009.

Homo - Brena - Đapić

Mladen Schwartz


Homo - Brena - Đapić

Dva su velika sveca imenom Antun: onaj egipatski, Pustinjak (III-IV st.), otac redovništva, čije su nam strahovite kušnje zorno prikazali Schongauer, Grünewald, Bosch i Dalí, te, u Hrvata još više štovani, sv. Antun Padovanski (XII-XIII st.), franjevac, misionar, govornik, čiji je jezik, prema legendi, i nakon smrti ostao neoštećen. Ovoga se Antuna slavi na 13. lipnja, a u Nezavisnoj Državi Hrvatskoj nadnevak je, zvani Hrvatsko Antunovo, bio državni blagdan, dan Hrvatskih Oružanih Snaga, proslavljan vojnim mimohodom pred šefom Države, poglavnikom Antom Pavelićem. Uz druge velike hrvatske Antune, Starčevića i Radića, on je toga dana slavio i svoj imendan.

Danas se blagdan Antunova u Zagrebu ne obilježava dostojanstveno, nego sramotno. Umjesto slavne vojske pod oružjem, Zagrebom defiliraju četnička pevaljka Brena i homoseksualni agit-propovci.

* * * * * *

ĆE DA BIJEMO GEJÔVE... - tako su govorila "braća" Srbi za beogradske "gejparade", pa su to, Bogme, i učinili. A ni u Moskvi, homo-provokatori nisu ništa bolje prošli. Naprotiv,

u Zagrebu: samo mirni prosvjedi? Možda paljenje svijeća, kao za Brenu (umjesto da Brena brennt)? Po zapovijedi gazdiju nad gazdama, takozvane EU i judeo-masonske Nadvlade, i u nas dobile su ogavne porno-pedo-peder-pride-parade pravo građanstva, štoviše aureolu ugledne, već tradicionalne institucije. Ono što su zdravi prostori i vremena oduvijek smatrali kazne (pa i smrtne) vrijednim prijestupom, ili barem sućuti vrijednim poremećajem, i u nas postalo je predmetom osobne odluke te povodom za tobožnje "slavlje različitosti". Na taj način globalna nadvlada sije dekadenciju, e da bi uništila i narode s inače jačim uporištem u starim vrednotama i žilavijom moći odolijevanja. Homoseksualnost je od zlodjela i bolesti postala posljedicom "slobodnog izbora spolne orijentacije". Tako se degenerira narodna substancija, tako se kvari ukus i etos , tako se zavodi i uništava mladež. I umjesto da ovo čemu danas pribivamo bude strogo progonjeno i kažnjeno, na udaru su zdrave reakcije, koje se, pod manipulativnim nazivom "homofobije", proglašava malne nekom vrstom zločina i duševne bolesti, vrijedne psihoanalitičkoga kauča te ispiranja mozga. I dok se s homo-ludovanjem poistovjećuje cijeli veleizdajnički državni vrh, prosvjedni skupovi protiv homomanijaka na rubu su ilegale, zabrane, izloženi represiji, rastjerivanju i uhitbama.

BRENA U ARENA. Dočim je hrvatski ratnik i domoljubni kantautor Thompson u vlastitoj domovini gotovo stavljen izvan zakona - i to pod pritiskom onih istih židovskih i srodnih snaga koje gromoglasno brane "gejparadu" - inozemna pjevačica, koja je u prošlomu ratu izravno podupirala protuhrvatsku stranu, sada je, po komandi opet istih koji nam izvoze i homo-propagandu, dobrodošla gostujuća umjetnica, uz zaštitu 2000 hrvatskih redarstvenika, s 50 tisuća eura honorara (tražila je dvostruko), te pred barem petnaestak tisuća oduševljenih "fanova". "Lepa" Brena posjećuje Hrvatsku u sklopu svoje turneje po postjugoslavenskim zemljama. Poruka je bjelodana: valja uskrisiti pokojno smeće bratstva-jedinstva. Jer, nije u pitanju Brenina glazba: žena je posve nadarena, u svom žanru dobra pjevačica, ima sluha, ima glasa i stasa, a melodije i tekstovi čak su joj nadprosječni za tu vrstu turkoidnog šunda.

Brena je, rođena kao Fahreta Jahić, potomka hrvatskih muslimana iz naše Herceg-Bosne. Ne može je se odveć osuđivati što se u velesrpskom Beogradu, udana Živojinović, uvjerljivo posrbila. Kao takva, postala je maskotom bosanske četničke soldateske i razumljivo je da više ne će i ne može biti Hrvatica ili ustašica. Pošteni Srbin uvijek je prihvatljiviji od ljigavog, prijetvornog, pogubnog jugoslavena. Problem je s Brenom upravo njezina jugoslavenština, problem je što ona u Hrvatskoj i ne pronosi zdravo, prirodno srpstvo koje hrvatski nacionalist može i treba poštivati.

Brena, skupa sa svojim urbanijim kolegama na "b": Bora-čorbom, Balaševićem, Bregom, Bajagom, širi ogavni dah jugo-strvine, zavodeći neuku i neodgojenu posthrvatsku mladež, baš kako to, drugim sredstvima, čini i nastrani homo-teror. Zato je Brena nedobrodošla, zato je opasna, zato ju je trebalo na granici uhititi, ispitati o ratnim grijesima i, u najboljem slučaju, za vječna vremena protjerati iz svete nam zemlje Kroacije. Umjesto toga, zavedeni i zaluđeni hrvatski puk mantra svoje bedastoće: Ne zabranjivati (osim Thompsona i U-znakovlja, naravno)! Tko voli nek izvoli! - Tako trivijalno glasi formula sigurne propasti!

IMENDAN ANTONIJA ĐAPIĆA. Jest, na sv. Antu i on slavi svoj imendan, on, negdašnji vođa pravaša. Što je od Đapića ostalo? Uoči Antunova, pred kamerama se opravdavao za nestanak desetaka milijuna kuna iz osiječke gradske blagajne. Na izborima za gradonačelnika neslavno je propao. Na prošlim parlamentarnim izborima najavljivao je u Saboru deset ili petnaest pravaša, ostao je jedini. Sada navodno ne će ni u Sabor, traže mu ostavku. No Đapić je žilav borac za vlast i moć, nakon najtežih poraza on se dočeka na noge. Hoće li se to sada ponoviti? Možda, ali ne bi valjalo. Hrvatska treba jaku desnicu, jaka desnica uključuje i snažan pravaški pokret, a on može stasati samo bez Ante Đapića. Zdrave jezgre svih pravaških stranaka moraju se na razini baze početi približavati, povezivati, ujedinjavati, te iznjedriti istinskog vođu Osobita tu uloga pripada - tupom malograđanštinom i robskim mentalitetom nezatrovanoj, neopterećenoj, odvažnoj, svježoj državotvorno-nacionalističkoj mladeži. Uistinu desne snage, one koje se ne zaklinju na antifašizam i demokraciju, one koje ne slušaju ni Ollija Rehna ni Baracka Obamu niti judeo-masonsku internacionalu, moraju naći put sebi, put životu, put pobjedi. Ne zbude li se to, Hrvatskoj je odzvonilo.

A zbude li se pak, onda više neće biti pederske sramote na hrvatskim trgovima, niti "lepih" Brena u hrvatskim arenama.

Mladen Schwartz

ponedjeljak, 10. kolovoza 2009.

The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe


The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe, Part I

Tom Sunic August 9, 2009

No word in the modern Western parlance is as scary as the word „race“. It is avoided like the plague by contemporary opinion makers, except when they gleefully use its verbal derivative „racist“ against right-wingers, White nationalists, forever looming „neo-Nazis“ and their proverbial bed fellows „anti-Semites“. In modern science, let alone in the social sciences, the word and the concept of race is denounced as a social construct, not being admitted as biological reality, despite overwhelming evidence that race is not just skin deep and that different races world-wide show marked differences in behavior, cultural achievements, and in IQ. As professor Daniel A. Beach recently noted: „Race pervades a great deal of social and interpersonal issues with which we must contend, yet we have no effective way of talking about it“.

Unlike their colleagues in the social sciences, many Western biologists and geneticists are well aware of differences among races, yet they prefer to resort to esoteric verbiage and expressions, such as "mapping the genome," or "different gene pools" or "different haplotypes," when doing research on the tricky subject of race.

Prior to the early 20th century the words „race“ and „racist“ were rarely used in the English, French, or German languages in Europe. Everybody knew which race he belonged to. The etymology of the word 'race' is still unclear, although most likely it derives from the old Latin word 'radix,' meaning roots, or the German 'reiza, meaning family lineage. Its significance became ideologically loaded only in the late 1920s. Over the last 50 years, it has undergone a total semantic distortion. Indeed, if one were to follow the logic and discourse of professional antiracists, peoples of European ancestry must be all certified racists. Why? Because it is still an unwritten rule that White males and females all over the West mate and date solely within their own race.

European "Gestalt": In Quest of Order and Form

The concept of eugenics is now associated with National Socialism and has come to be understood among the educated classes as the epitome of evil. In fact, however, eugenic measures were a standard family practice from time immemorial among European tribes. Undoubtedly, each family had to be prolific with a multitude of children able to work on the land or to guard the household. This meant allowing and frequently facilitating the death of children who were sickly or had disabilities.

Until recently in the European countryside when a young girl and boy were about to start dating, parents first inquired about whether their respective fathers or mothers were alcoholics, whether somebody in their family tree had some serious illness, such as diabetes, tuberculosis, or some „nervous disorder“ or even inborn proclivity to criminal behavior. A semi-literate, yet intelligent European peasant or farmer did not have to be versed in sociobiology or have a degree in molecular biology in order to real ize that hereditary diseases of the unfortunate partner could easily be transmitted to the newborns, with deadly social consequences for the entire family.

In France it is still common to hear the expression „elle est de bonne race“ ("she is of good breed or character") for a good looking and healthy woman. In the Croatian or the Serbian language one can hear among young adults the colloquial adjective 'rasna' ('raceful') when depicting a good and healthy looking woman. In such particular instances „race“ is more a synonym of good health and good looks and less a scientific term for a distinctive European appearance.

After 1945 everything changed. The whole hell of moralizing and do-good pontificating broke loose. The more degenerate, the more maladaptive and the uglier - the better. The role of the environment became a sacrosanct dogma of liberal and communist world improvers, while blind faith in progress became a shining path for a promiscuous end of history. Especially the German word „Rasse“, which was commonly used in the 1920s, 30s and the early 40's, came to be highly uncomfortable for postwar German politicians who were themselves to be groomed by the Allies in self-hate and guilt feelings about their race.'Rasse' is a sharp monosyllabic word whose consonant 's' requires the speaker to emit a hissing sound.

Hence the reason that the legacy of National Socialism and thousands of German titles dealing with race, racial hygiene, racial studies, racial mixing, etc., had to disappear from library shelves, only to reappear as a subject of criminal proceedings in modern Germany. The German ruling class today is quick to raise the red flag against scholars who dare to use this word in a normative and value free manner. Shortly after WWII, thousands of books dealing with race and racial differences were burned and destroyed by the Allies. Institutes specializing in racial hygiene, such as Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rassenhygiene or the prestigious Kaiser Wilhelm Institut für Anthropologie, were closed down. Hundreds of European doctors and specialists in genetics and biology - if not spirited out furtively to the USA or the USSR - were hunted down as war criminals, or denounced as proverbial Nazi quacks. (See Manfred Heinemann, Hochschuloffiziere und Wiederaufbau des Hochschulwesens in Westdeutschland,19441952. See also Reinhard Grohnert, Die Entnazifizierung in Baden 1945/1949.)

In Gods We Trust: Ancient "Ethnic Profiling"

The word 'race' did not exist but the sense of racial beauty and racial awareness was firmly grounded in the minds of ancient Europeans. In Homer's Iliad most gods and goddesses are fair skinned and light eyed. Athena is described byPindar as as the „blond and blue eyed goddess“, whereas tricksters or fickle persons, personified by satires and centaurs had repulsive Levantine features with wooly hair, thick lips and hooked noses. (R. Peterson, The Classical World, 1985, pp 30/31).

In the Middle Ages one encounters those grotesque images of ugliness on basilicas and cathedrals where gargoyles were used as ornamented water spouts projecting from roofs or water fountains. Those negative images displaying non-European racial traits would be banned today, as our modern multiracial pontiffs do not tolerate racial stereotyping, or what they euphemistically call „ethnic profiling“. Likely, many out-group individuals in modern American or European cities would detect in those figures strange resemblance to their own non-European facial traits.

Gargoyle from Westminster Abbey, London

In a well-researched, yet forgotten book, Professor Allen G. Roper (Ancient Eugenics, 1913) provides a great many citations from ancient Greek and Latin texts describing eugenic practices by the old Greeks and Romans. Infanticide was not considered a barbaric act, but a paramount political necessity for a city-state in perennial crisis and warfare. They did not have a luxury of feeding genetic misfits, potential crooks, or the dregs of racial outgroups. The Spartan leader Solon drafted the first eugenic laws, and the Stoic Roman philosopher Seneca encouraged infanticide for misfits. (We drown the weaklings and the monstrosity. It is not passion but reason to separate the useless from the fit).

In ancient Rome of the Republic, racial purity and close-knit bonds among kin were extremely valued. The whole concept of the city-state was premised on a small family unit, with the typical pater familias at the helm. Even today in popular unwritten culture in Europe, a saying goes that a person's character can best be recognized in his facial features. Conversely, a person's distorted character follows his distorted countenance, - a saying that was common in ancient Rome("Distortum vultum sequitur distortio morum.").

It is a dangerous mistake, very widespread among White European American nationalists that the ancient Greeks were all of Nordic ancestry. As I have written elsewhere, the blond dolichocephalic faces that one finds painted on old Greek murals or pottery, or even bronze busts of Roman and Greek leaders, had primarily normative value; they were meant as the enhanced ideal type for what White Europeans should be - not the reflection of what they looked like in real life.

This is particularly relevant because of childish quarrels among E uropean and American Whites nationalists and self-proclaimed Aryans. Such people often imagine ancient Spartan warriors as blond giants or even picture the Waffen SS as superhuman extraterrestrial beings.

It should come as no surprise that the concept of beauty and race in prewar Europe, and particular in prewar Germany, witnessed a return to romanticized classicism. Models from antiquity and the Renaissance were adapted to the prevailing spirit of the times. Numerous German sculptors worked on their projects while benefiting from the logistic and financial support of the National Socialist political elite. Their sculptures resembled, either by form, or by composition, the works of Praxiteles or of Phidias of ancient Greece, or those executed by Michelangelo during the Renaissance. The most prominent German sculptors in the Third Reich were Arno Breker, Josef Thorak, and Fritz Klimsch, who although enjoying the significant logistical support of the National Socialist regime, were never members of the NSDAP.

"Partei" (The Party") on the left and "Wehrmacht" ("The Army") on the right, by Arno Breker, at the New Reich-Chancellery, 1939

The Wave/Die Woge, Fritz Klimsch, 1942

Das Urteil des Paris, Haus des Deutschen Kunst, Josef Thorak, 1941

After the Second World War, as the result of pressure from the Allies, Europe - and to a large extent America itself - were forced to open its doors to abstract art (Jackson Pollock, Piet Mondrian, etc) and, consequently Euro Americans and in particularly the Germans had to stifle the production of their traditional figurative art. A large number of paintings and other works of art executed during the Third Reich were either removed or destroyed. Several hundred sculptures were demolished or trashed during the Allied air bombardments. After the war, a considerable number of works of art were confiscated by the Americans, because of „their pornographic character“. In the spring of 1947, 8,722 paintings and sculptures of German artists were transported to the United States. Of these, only a small number have been returned to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Arno Breker's work thrown in a backyard, 1945

The concept of racial beauty in ancient Greece or during the Renaissance in the 15th century Italy was often used as a pedagogical and graphic tool to provide the sense of order and form (Gestalt). In traditional Europe and America the vast majority of citizens were never ever the replicas of these hyperreal beauties represented on busts or sculptures.

Paintings of women by the late Italians Botticelli or Titian, or sculptures by the modern Germans Breker or Thorak, did not suggest that that all Italian and German women have elongated Gothic limbs, thin noses and Nordic cranial index.

The whole purpose of classicism and neoclassicisms, particularly in plastic art, but also in philosophy and literature suggested that Europeans had to abide by the cosmic rules of racial form and order. Whatever and whoever departs from order !

dr. Tomislav Sunić (USA)

To be continued.